Full text of statement on Seven CEO misconduct allegations

The allegations of misconduct by Tim Worner have not been substantiated

Tim Worner

• The allegations of misconduct by Tim Worner have not been substantiated
• Worner and Harrison used language the board finds totally objectionable
• Worner has been disciplined by the chairman and the board, no further action

Allegations made by a former employee of misconduct by the Seven West Media (“SWM”) CEO, Tim Worner, were released to the media in late December 2016 (the “Statement”).

Given the seriousness of the allegations involved the board sought that an urgent and thorough independent review be conducted.

The review was conducted by Richard Harris, a litigation and investigations partner at Allens Linklaters, and included interviews with key current and former executives and employees relevant to the allegations. The former employee, Amber Harrison, was also interviewed as part of the thorough review.

The review looked into each of the key allegations of misconduct contained in the Statement including: the payment of a bonus to Harrison; the circumstances of the investigation into her corporate credit card expenses; the corporate credit card expenses of Worner and other allegations of drug use and their personal yet inappropriate relationship, which concluded in 2014; and allegations of other inappropriate staff relationships by Worner.

The board has now received and reviewed Harris’ report and has considered all relevant circumstances. The board has concluded that the allegations of misconduct by Mr Worner have not been substantiated as the board is satisfied that:

• The company’s identification of significant credit card misuse by Ms Harrison was not instigated by, or on behalf of, Worner or his office and they had no involvement in the investigation.
• Worner did not influence, nor play any role, in the awarding of the bonus to Harrison other than signing the letters which informed her, and other executive assistants, of their bonus.
• Company funds were not deployed in furthering the relationship by Worner or with his approval. There were no irregularities in Worner’s corporate credit card use.
• The strong and vehement denials by the four employees falsely accused of having an inappropriate relationship with Worner are accepted without reservation and cast doubt on the veracity of other accusations.
• The allegations of illicit drug use by Worner could not be substantiated.
• Worner did not have any involvement in the way the company dealt with Harrison after the relationship between them became known by the company.

This has been a tumultuous time for the entire company and with the receipt of the independent review this matter can now be brought to a conclusion.

The board is aware that there were a number of communications that passed between Worner and Harrison that were of a highly personal nature that used language and expressed concepts that the board finds totally objectionable.

However, the board is of the view that the communications were consensual, personal and private in nature and were only disclosed as a result of a breach of express confidentiality obligations.

The board has at all times made clear to Worner that while the relationship, which concluded in July 2014, was personal and consensual, it was inappropriate given his senior position in the company and not behaviour condoned by the company.

Worner has been disciplined by the chairman and the board and provided an undertaking this behaviour will not be repeated, as well as an apology.

However, the board has concluded following the receipt of the independent report there are no grounds to take any further disciplinary action against Worner beyond the action which was taken in 2014 when the company became aware of the inappropriate relationship.

The board has addressed all the issues that have been raised and is confident that Worner will continue to run the company in the interests of all shareholders.

The final report provided to it by Allens Linklaters is subject to legal privilege and therefore cannot be made public.

Subscribe to the Mediaweek Morning Report with the form below.

Most Popular

To Top