John Phung: Google’s cookie reversal is a mixed bag for digital marketers

google cookies

“The reliance on cookies has been a double-edged sword.”

By John Phung, head of data and analytics at G Squared

Google has decided not to move forward with plans to eliminate third-party cookies from its Chrome browser. This decision marks a significant deviation from its previously stated goal of enhancing user privacy and brings mixed reactions from the digital marketing community, which has long depended on cookies for targeting and measurement.

Initially, Google had pledged to phase out third-party cookies by 2022, aligning with privacy-focused measures taken by other browsers like Apple Safari and Firefox. However, recent developments have led Google to reconsider. The shift was prompted by inadequate performance results from Google’s Privacy Sandbox, an alternative designed to replace cookies with privacy-preserving technologies.

Google’s decision was influenced by feedback from the advertising industry regarding the ineffectiveness of the Privacy Sandbox. The proposed solutions failed to deliver the same level of precision in ad targeting and measurement as third-party cookies. The performance issues with these new tools threatened to disrupt the advertising ecosystem, leading Google to maintain the status quo while seeking better alternatives.

An outdated technology

Third-party cookies are an outdated and increasingly ineffective technology. Cookies often fall short in accurately measuring and reporting marketing effectiveness. Their limitations in cross-device tracking and precise user identification make them less reliable for comprehensive attribution and targeting. Google’s decision to retain cookies, despite their known flaws, appears to be a step backward rather than a move towards innovative solutions.

This decision allows agencies to continue using existing tools and methods without immediate disruption. However, it also underscores the need for the industry to develop and adopt more advanced, privacy-compliant technologies that can offer the same, if not better, capabilities without relying on cookies.

For digital marketing agencies, this announcement brings a temporary reprieve. Third-party cookies have historically been the backbone of digital advertising strategies, allowing for audience targeting and baseline reporting. However, the reliance on cookies has been a double-edged sword. While they provide critical data for marketing campaigns, cookies are increasingly seen as outdated and imprecise, often failing to accurately measure and report gaps and deduped marketing efforts, especially in this ever-evolving omni-channel and fast-paced digital marketing scene.

In stark contrast to Google’s decision, many martech and attribution reporting vendors have forged ahead, embracing innovative cookieless technologies. Cookieless tracking in summary refers to the collection of information about website visitors without using third-party cookies. These vendors have implemented solutions that leverage first-party data, user contextual information, and advanced machine learning algorithms to deliver precise targeting and measurement without compromising user privacy.

These innovations represent a promising path for the industry. However, implementing such innovative cookieless tracking technologies is costly and often difficult to justify against a client’s marketing budget. This economic trade-off challenges brands to balance the benefits of advanced privacy-compliant solutions with the real impact on their marketing spends. If only Google had paved the way by removing third-party cookies, potentially easing the burden and accelerating the widespread adoption of these new technologies.

Google’s decision to retain third-party cookies in Chrome provides a less than confidence relief for digital marketers and the martech industry but also highlights the inadequacies of relying on outdated technology. While it ensures continuity and stability, it delays the necessary evolution towards more advanced, privacy-friendly solutions. Google has acknowledged that the best option is to give consumers the choice, but will they find the choice easily if that’s not really the option?

See also: ‘Google cannot be relied upon:’ Industry reacts to third-party cookies backflip

Top image: John Phung

To Top